基于mtDNA COI的假眼小绿叶蝉系统发育研究

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.06.022

茶叶科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 601-608.doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.06.022

基于mtDNA COI的假眼小绿叶蝉系统发育研究

付建玉¹, 李乐^1,2, 袁志军¹, 唐美君¹, 肖强^1,*

1. 农业部茶树生物学与资源利用重点实验室,中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,浙江杭州 310008;
2. 济南市林业局,山东济南 250099

收稿日期:2014-04-30 修回日期:2014-07-21 出版日期:2014-12-20 发布日期:2019-09-03
通讯作者: *xqtea@mail.tricaas.com
作者简介:付建玉（1978— ）,男,山东青岛人,副研究员,主要从事分子生物学研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31100503、31470693）、科技基础性工作专项（2013FY113200）、浙江省公益技术研究农业项目（2013C32086）

Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Tea Green Leafhopper (Empoasca vitis) Based on mtDNA COI Sequences

FU Jianyu¹, LI Le^1,2, YUAN Zhijun¹, TANG Meijun¹, XIAO Qiang^1,*

1. Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Resources Utilization of Agriculture Ministry, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China;
2. Jinan Forestry Bureau, Jinan 250099, China

Received:2014-04-30 Revised:2014-07-21 Online:2014-12-20 Published:2019-09-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 克隆测定了12个茶树假眼小绿叶蝉Empoasca vitis（Göthe）种群84个样本和5个叶蝉近缘种外群62个虫体的线粒体DNA COI基因序列片段,利用生物信息学软件分析其序列同源性、遗传结构及系统进化关系。发现我国茶树假眼小绿叶蝉种群间的遗传距离为0.5%~1.2%,远小于昆虫物种2%的界限,未呈现明显遗传分化,ML分子系统树也显示其种群个体呈平行分布。假眼小绿叶蝉与几种外群叶蝉的遗传距离在14.8%~24.5%之间,依次为葡萄小绿叶蝉<葡萄二星叶蝉<桃一点斑叶蝉,说明它与葡萄小绿叶蝉亲缘关系最近,与系统进化树的聚类结果一致。本研究首次通过mtCOI基因序列分析,揭示了假眼小绿叶蝉遗传结构及它与近缘种叶蝉的系统进化关系,为解释它在茶园的起源及适应机制提供了基础。

关键词: 假眼小绿叶蝉, mtDNA COI, 遗传距离, 系统发育

Abstract: The mtDNA COI genes of 84 samples from 12 populations of tea green leafhopper Empoasca vitis (Göthe) and 62 samples from three leafhopper outgroups of Empoasca flavescens, Erythroneura apicalis and Erythroneura sudra were cloned and sequenced, and their genetic structure and phylogeny were bioinformatically analyzed. Results showed that the genetic distances among 12 tea green leafhopper populations were 0.5%-1.2%, which were all less than the species boundary of 2%, and the obvious genetic differentiation was not elemonstrated. The ML phylogmetic tree also showed that E. vitis was no priority within-population. The genetic distances between E. vitis and other outgroup leafhopper were 14.8%-24.5%, and E. flavescens showed the closest relationship with E. vitis while E. sudra was the most distant species to E. vitis. The phylogenetic tree based on ML method also showed the leafhoppers from tea and grape were one group while peach leafhopper was another divergent group. The genetic distance and phylogenetic relationship of tea leafhopper were revealed by using mtDNA COI biomarker, which provided the foundation for exploring its origin and adaptive mechanism in tea plantation.

Key words: Empoasca vitis, mtDNA COI, genetic distance, phylogeny

中图分类号:

付建玉, 李乐, 袁志军, 唐美君, 肖强. 基于mtDNA COI的假眼小绿叶蝉系统发育研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(6): 601-608. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.06.022.

FU Jianyu, LI Le, YUAN Zhijun, TANG Meijun, XIAO Qiang. Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Tea Green Leafhopper (Empoasca vitis) Based on mtDNA COI Sequences[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2014, 34(6): 601-608. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.06.022.

参考文献 19

[1]	苗进, 韩宝瑜. 假眼小绿叶蝉(Empoasca vitis Göthe)在不同品种茶树上的取食行为[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10): 3973-3983.
[2]	葛钟麟, 张汉鹄. 中国茶叶蝉种类研究(一)[J]. 茶叶通报, 1988, 1: 15-18.
[3]	赵冬香, 陈宗懋. 茶小绿叶蝉优势种的归属[J]. 茶叶科学, 2000, 20(2): 101-104.
[4]	Fornasiero D, Duso C, Pozzebon A, et al. Effects of Irrigation on the Seasonal Abundance of Empoasca vitis in North-Italian Vineyards[J]. J Econ Entomol, 2012, 105(1): 176-185.
[5]	陈宗懋. 茶园病虫区系的构成和演替[J]. 中国茶叶, 1979, 1(1): 6-8.
[6]	Takiya DM.Systematic studies on the leafhopper subfamily Cicadellinae (HEMIPTERA: CICADELLIDAE) [D]. USA: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2007: 31-54.
[7]	张亚平, 施立明. 动物线粒体DNA多态性的研究概况[J]. 动物学研究, 1992, 13(3): 289-298.
[8]	Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, et al. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers[J]. Ann Entomol Soc Am, 1994, 87(6): 651-701.
[9]	Boykin LM, Shatters RG, Rosell RC, et al. Global relationships of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) revealed using Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial COI DNA sequences[J]. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 2007, 44(3): 1306-1319.
[10]	Monti MM, Nappo AG, Giorgini M.Molecular characterization of closely related species in the parasitic genus Encarsia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) based on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene[J]. Bull Entomol Res, 2005, 95(5): 401-408.
[11]	王备新, 杨莲芳. 线粒体DNA序列特点与昆虫系统学研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2002, 39(2): 88-92.
[12]	Dietrich CH, Whitcomb RF, Black WC.Phylogeny of the grassland leafhopper genus Flexamia (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences[J]. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 1997, 8(2): 139-149.
[13]	Castalanelli MA, Baker AM, Munyard KA, et al. Molecular phylogeny supports the paraphyletic nature of the genus Trogoderma (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) collected in the Australasian ecozone[J]. Bull Entomol Res, 2012, 102(1): 17-28.
[14]	张雅林. 中国叶蝉分类研究(同翅目:叶蝉科)[M]. 陕西:天则出版社, 1990: 218.
[15]	Bidochka MJ, Small CL, Spironello M.Recombination within sympatric cryptic species of the insect pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae[J]. Environ Microbiol, 2005, 7(9): 1361-1368.
[16]	Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2013, 30(12): 2725-2729.
[17]	Sun XJ, Xiao JH, Cook JM, et al. Comparisons of host mitochondrial, nuclear and endosymbiont bacterial genes reveal cryptic fig wasp species and the effects of Wolbachia on host mtDNA evolution and diversity[J]. BMC Evol Biol, 2011, 11: 86.
[18]	Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species[J]. Proc Biol Sci, 2003, 270(Suppl 1): S96-S99.
[19]	Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J]. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci, 2003, 270(1512): 313-321.

基于mtDNA COI的假眼小绿叶蝉系统发育研究

Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Tea Green Leafhopper (Empoasca vitis) Based on mtDNA COI Sequences

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	闫明慧, 刘柯, 王满, 吕颖, 张倩. 信阳10号叶绿体基因组及其系统进化[J]. 茶叶科学, 2021, 41(6): 777-788.
[2]	胡治远, 刘素纯, 徐正刚, 刘石泉, 文欣. 湖南益阳黑茶中桔青霉线粒体全基因组序列测定及分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(6): 830-844.
[3]	李建宇, 史梦竹, 傅建炜, 王婷, 张志康. 茶假眼小绿叶蝉抗联苯菊酯品系和敏感品系解毒酶活性及增效作用研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2016, 36(3): 323-329.
[4]	边磊, 孙晓玲, 陈宗懋. 假眼小绿叶蝉的日飞行活动性及成虫飞行能力的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(3): 248-252.
[5]	刘威, 叶乃兴, 陈玉森, 连玲丽, 刘伟, 金珊, 赖建东, 谢运海. 茶树炭疽菌Colletotrichum fructicola的鉴定及系统发育分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(1): 95-104.
[6]	王沅江, 谢振伦, 庞雄飞. 假眼小绿叶蝉及天敌蜘蛛生态位的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2008, 28(6): 401-406.
[7]	李慧玲, 林乃铨. 假眼小绿叶蝉卵缨小蜂的生物学特性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2008, 28(6): 407-413.
[8]	曾兆华, 周喆, 魏智娟, 陈少波, 尤民生. 五种杀虫剂对圆果大赤螨毒力及其对假眼小绿叶蝉捕食作用的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2007, 27(2): 147-152.
[9]	徐金汉, 王念武, 张灵玲, 关雄. 假眼小绿叶蝉防治指标的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2005, 25(2): 131-135.
[10]	赵冬香, 高景林, 徐汉虹, 陈宗懋. 印楝对假眼小绿叶蝉鸣声通讯影响的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2005, 25(2): 136-140.
[11]	赵冬香, 高景林, 陈宗懋, 徐汉虹. 假眼小绿叶蝉鸣声的初步研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2004, 24(4): 235-239.
[12]	陈宗懋, 许宁, 韩宝瑜, 赵冬香. 茶树–害虫–天敌间的化学信息联系[J]. 茶叶科学, 2003, 23(s1): 38-45.
[13]	赵冬香, 陈宗懋, 程家安. 茶树-假眼小绿叶蝉-白斑猎蛛间化学通讯物的分离与活性鉴定[J]. 茶叶科学, 2002, 22(02): 109-114.
[14]	曾莉, 王平盛, 许玫. 茶树对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2001, 21(02): 90-93.
[15]	赵冬香, 陈宗懋, 程家安. 假眼小绿叶蝉对不同颜色偏嗜性的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2001, 21(01): 78-80+68.