基于nSSR和cpDNA序列的城步峒茶群体遗传多样性和结构研究

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.02.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用简单重复序列标记(nSSR)与叶绿体DNA序列(cpDNA)分析技术,对城步峒茶群体进行了遗传多样性、遗传结构和遗传分化等研究。结果表明,15对nSSR引物在参试81份资源中共获得142个等位位点,平均每对引物9.47个,城步峒茶群体的观测杂合度(Ho)、期望杂合度(He)和Nei期望杂合度(Nei)分别为0.49、0.62和0.62,具有较高的遗传多样性。Structure分析将79份峒茶资源分成3个类群,但各类群的遗传背景较为复杂,没有明显的群体结构。F检验表明,城步峒茶群体的近交系数F_IS为正值(F_IS=0.177 5),群体间的遗传分化系数F_ST较小(F_ST=0.034 5),分化程度较低,基因流Nm较高(Nm=7.01)。3对cpDNA引物分别获得了473 bp(rbcL)、704 bp(matK)和320 bp(psbH-trnA)的片段序列,变异位点占总位点的比例分别为0.42%、0.71%和1.25%。将3个序列依次拼接,共产生了9个单倍型,单倍型数由多到少的居群依次为TXZ(6)、DZC(4)、DPS(4)、TYS(3)、HJZ(2),群体的单倍型多样性(Hd)和核苷酸多样性(π)分别为0.732和0.001 39。9个单倍型中,单倍型H1和H5处于进化网络图的中心节点上,并且包含资源数量最多,属于比较原始的单倍型。同时,nSSR和cpDNA的AMOVA分析结果基本一致,居群内的变异百分比分别达到96.69%和80.54%,城步峒茶的遗传变异主要存在于居群内。

关键词: 茶树, 城步峒茶, nSSR, cpDNA, 遗传多样性, 群体结构

Abstract: The 81 accessions were detected by 15 nuclear SSR and 3 cpDNA markers. A total of 142 observed number of alleles were detected, and the expected homozygosty (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), Nei’s expected heterozygosity (Nei) of Chengbudong tea were 0.49, 0.62 and 0.62, respectively, suggesting Dong tea had a high genetic diversity. The STRUCTURE software was applied to the nSSR data to infer the genetic structure in the 79 Chengbudong tea accessions. When K=3, the Delta K value was maximized, but the five populations belonged to a mixed population without any clear genetic structure. F test showed that the inbreeding coefficient of Chengbudong tea was positive (F_IS=0.177 5). Genetic differentiation coefficient F_ST was 0.034 5, indicating a low degree of differentiation and high gene flow (Nm=7.01). The aligned chloroplast DNA sequences of rbcL, matK and trnH-psbA were 473 bp, 704 bp, 320 bp in length. The polymorphic site percentages were 0.42%, 0.71% and 1.25%, respectively. A total of 9 haplotypes (H1-H9) were identified across the 81 tea accessions including two outgroup accessions. TXZ population had the highest haplotypes (6), followed by DZC (4), DPS (4), TYS (3) and HJZ (2). The total haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) were 0.732 and 0.001 39, respectively. Among 9 cpDNA haplotypes, haplotypes H1 and H5 were the ancestral haplotypes. The sources of genetic differentiation were revealed within and among populations by the AMOVA method. The results of nSSR and cpDNA analysis were basically consistent, with variations within populations of 96.69% (nSSR) and 80.54% (cpDNA), respectively.

Key words: tea plant, Chengbudong tea, nSSR, cpDNA, genetic diversity, population structure

中图分类号:

S571.1
S324

刘振, 成杨, 杨培迪, 赵洋, 宁静, 杨阳. 基于nSSR和cpDNA序列的城步峒茶群体遗传多样性和结构研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(2): 250-258. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.02.011.

LIU Zhen, CHENG Yang, YANG Peidi, ZHAO Yang, NING Jing, YANG Yang. Genetic Diversity and Structure of Chengbudong Tea Population Revealed by nSSR and cpDNA Markers[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(2): 250-258. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.02.011.

参考文献

[1] Chen L, Zhou Z X.Variations of main quality components of tea genetic resources preserved in China national germplasm tea repository[J]. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2005, 60(1): 31-35.
[2] 陈兴琰, 唐明德, 陈国本, 等. 湖南主要茶树群体种质资源研究(上)[J]. 茶叶通讯, 1989(1): 34-39.
Chen X Y, Tang M D, Chen G B, et al.Study on the germplasm resources of main tea populations in Hunan province[J]. Journal of Tea Communication, 1989(1): 34-39.
[3] 刘振, 李赛君, 成杨, 等. 城步县茶树种质资源调查初报[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2018, 45(1): 24-28.
Liu Z, Li S J, Cheng Y, et al.Investigation report on tea germplasm resources in Chengbu county[J]. Journal of Tea Communication, 2018, 45(1): 24-28.
[1] Newton A C, Allnutt A R, Gillies A C, et al.Molecular phylogeography,intraspecific variation and the conservation of tree species[J]. Trends Ecology Evolution, 1999, 14(4): 140-145.
[2] Ni S, Chen L, Yao M Z, et al.Germplasm and breeding research of tea plant, Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze, based on DNA molecular marker approaches[J]. Frontiers of Agriculture in China. 2008, 2(2): 200-207.
[4] Petit R J, Kremar A, Wagner D B.Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in European oaks[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1993, 87(1/2): 122-128.
[3] Yang J B, Yang S X, Li H T, et al.Comparative chloroplast genomes of Camellia species[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8): e73053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073053.
[4] 马建强. 茶树高密度遗传图谱构建及重要性状QTL定位[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院研究生院, 2013.
Ma J Q.Construction of high-density genetic map and its application for QTL analysis in tea plant [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013.
[5] 成杨, 刘振, 赵洋, 等. 江华苦茶的亲缘关系与遗传多样性研究[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2019, 46(2): 141-148.
Cheng Y, Liu Z, Zhao Y, et al.Study on the genetic relationship and genetic diversity of Jianghua bitter tea[J]. Journal of Tea Communication, 2019, 46(2): 141-148.
[6] 高连明, 刘杰, 蔡杰, 等. 关于植物DNA条形码研究技术规范[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2012, 34(6): 592-606.
Gao L M, Liu J, Cai J, et al.A synopsis of technical notes on the standards for plant DNA barcoding[J]. Plant diversity and resources, 2012, 34(6): 592-606.
[7] Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al.MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2013, 30: 2725-2729.
[5] Bandelt H J, Forster P, Rohl A.Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1999, 16(1): 37-48.
[8] Excoffier L. Laval G, Schneider S.Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis[J]. Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 2005, 1: 47-50.
[9] Crandall K A, Templeton A R.Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with Applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction[J]. Genetics, 1993, 134(3): 959-969.
[10] Yao M Z, Ma C L, Qiao T T, et al.Diversity distribution and population structure of tea germplasms in China revealed by EST-SSR markers[J]. Tree Genetic adn Genomes, 2012, 8: 205-220.
[11] Fang W, Cheng H, Duan Y, et al.Genetic diversity and relationship of clonal tea (Camellia sinensis) cultivars in China as revealed by SSR markers[J]. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2012, 298(2): 469-483.
[6] Wang R J, Gao X F, Kong X R, et al.An efficient identification strategy of clonal tea cultivars using long-core motif SSR markers[J]. Springer Plus, 2016, 5: 1152-1168.
[12] 宋伟林. 基于SSR荧光标记毛细管电泳的油菜品种DNA指纹鉴定技术平台的建立与应用[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院研究生院, 2013.
Song W L.Establishment and application of a technology platform for DNA fingerprint identification of rapeseed cultivars based on capillary electrophoresis with SSR fluorescence makers [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013.
[7] Wambulwa M, Meegahakumbura M K, Kamuny S, et al.Insights into the genetic relationships and breeding patterns of the African tea germplasm based on nSSR markers and cpDNA sequences[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1244-1255.
[8] Harris S A, Ingram R.Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: the effects of intra-specific diversity and plastid transmission[J]. Taxon, 1991, 14: 393-412.
[13] Rendell S, Ennos R A.Chloroplast DNA diversity in Calluna vulgaris (heather) populations in Europe[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2002, 11: 69-78.
[9] Hamrick J L, Godt M J W, Sherman-Broyles S L. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species[J]. New Forests, 1992, 6(1): 95-124.
[14] Ennos R.Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations[J]. Heredity, 1994, 72(3): 250-259.
[15] 刘晶. 中国豆梨和川梨的遗传多样性和群体遗传结构研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
Liu J.Studies on genetic diversity and structure of Pyrus calleryana and P. pashia in China [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013.
[16] Millar C I.A steep cline in pinus muricata[J]. Evolution, 1983, 37: 311-319.
[10] 杜玉娟. 孓遗植物珙桐的群体遗传学和谱系地理学研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012.
Du Y J.Studies on population genetics and phylogeography of Davidia involucrata (Davidiaceae) [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012.
[11] Iketani H, Yamamoto T, Katayama H, et al.Introgression between native and prehistorically naturalized (archaeophytic) wild pear (Pyrus spp.) populations in Northern Tohoku, Northeast Japan[J]. Conservation Genetics, 2010, 11(1): 115-126.
[12] Petit R J, Duminil J, Fineschi S, et al.Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2005, 14: 689-701.