基于Logistic-ISM模型的茶农采纳病虫生态调控技术的影响因素及层次结构分析

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.015

茶叶科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 696-706.doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.015

• 研究报告 • 上一篇

基于Logistic-ISM模型的茶农采纳病虫生态调控技术的影响因素及层次结构分析

郑蓉蓉^1,2, 刘路星², 马妍丽¹, 王自帅¹, 陈少游¹, 何敦春^1,3,*, 谢联辉^1,*

1.福建农林大学植物病毒研究所,福建福州 350002;
2.福建农林大学安溪茶学院,福建泉州 362406;
3.福建江夏学院经济贸易学院,福建福州 350108

收稿日期:2019-09-18 修回日期:2019-12-12 出版日期:2020-10-15 发布日期:2020-10-10
通讯作者: * hedc@fafu.eu.cn;xielh@fafu.edu.cn
作者简介:郑蓉蓉,女,讲师,博士研究生,主要从事植保经济学方面的研究。
基金资助:
福建省社科研究基地生态文明研究中心项目（KXJD1807A）、福建省自然科学基金（2018J01707）、福建农林大学安溪茶学院骨干青年基金（ACKY2016001）、福建省安溪县现代农业产业园协同创新中心（KMd18003A）

Analysis on the Impact Factors and Hierarchical Structure of the Farmers’ Adoption of Tea Ecological Pest Management by Logistic-ISM Model

ZHENG Rongrong^1,2, LIU Luxing², MA Yanli¹, WANG Zishuai¹, CHEN Shaoyou¹, HE Dunchun^1,3,*, XIE Lianhui^1,*

1. Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2. Anxi college of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China;
3. School of Economics and Trade, Fujian Jiangxia University, Fuzhou 350108, China

Received:2019-09-18 Revised:2019-12-12 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 茶叶是中国重要的经济作物,品质安全附加值大,病虫防控是保障茶叶品质安全的关键环节。传统病虫防控的负外部性明显,生态调控是未来发展的方向,弄清茶农采纳生态调控技术的影响因素及其内在关系是重要的科学命题。为此,随机选取福建省五大茶区的517位茶农进行调查,对获取的数据采用Logistic回归模型分析茶农采纳生态调控技术的显著性影响因素,进而运用解释结构模型（Interpretative structural modeling,ISM）分析这些显著性因素间的层次结构,从茶农特征、技术认知和环境特征3个方面探讨因素间的内在逻辑。结果表明,在茶农采纳生态调控技术的显著性影响因素层次结构中,表层直接因素有茶叶年收益、销售模式、培训次数、政府抽检频率、往年病虫情况,中间因素有新技术成本和收益变化的认知、是否合作社成员、茶园面积,根源因素有文化教育程度、年龄,各层次因素沿根源层、中间层、表层、目标层逐级向上影响。据此,本文从合作、培训、监管、示范等方面提出了对茶树病虫生态调控技术推广进行宏观管理的建议。

关键词: 病虫生态调控, Logistic-ISM模型, 影响因素, 层次结构

Abstract: Tea is one of important economic crops in China. Tea pest management is the key to ensure the quantity and its added value. The conventional pest management mode had contributed to saving the amounts of tea but resulted in the pollution dilemma of tea and ecology simultaneously. In contrast, the ecological management mode can alleviate the pollution and increase the safety of tea and farmers’ revenue. However, promotion of the mode was limited in practice. Hence, it is an urgent scientific topic to ascertain the factors and its interaction mechanism of tea farmers’ adoption of the ecological pest management. In this study, the 517 tea farmers were selected randomly in five counties of Fujian province according to the designed questionnaire and some available data were collected to analyze the significant factors affecting tea farmers’ adoption of ecological pest management technology by the Logistic Regression Model. The hierarchy and inner logic relations of these significant factors were then discovered by the Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM). The results show that tea farmers’ adoption was significantly influenced by three hierarchy factors. The direct factors included annual tea revenue, sales model, frequency of technical training, frequency of government casual inspection and degree of pest occurrence of previous years. The intermediate factors included cognition of cost and benefit change of applying new technology, cooperative member or not and size of tea garden. The basic factors included education level and age. Finally, some suggestions for the promotion of tea ecological pest management were proposed according to these impact factors and their relationships.

Key words: tea ecological pest management, Logistic-ISM model, impact factors, hierarchy

中图分类号:

郑蓉蓉, 刘路星, 马妍丽, 王自帅, 陈少游, 何敦春, 谢联辉. 基于Logistic-ISM模型的茶农采纳病虫生态调控技术的影响因素及层次结构分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(5): 696-706. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.015.

ZHENG Rongrong, LIU Luxing, MA Yanli, WANG Zishuai, CHEN Shaoyou, HE Dunchun, XIE Lianhui. Analysis on the Impact Factors and Hierarchical Structure of the Farmers’ Adoption of Tea Ecological Pest Management by Logistic-ISM Model[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(5): 696-706. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.015.

参考文献 22

[1]	谭济才. 茶树病虫防控学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2014: 210-218.Tan J C.Prevention and control of diseases and pests in tea trees [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2014: 210-218.
[2]	陈宗懋. 我国茶产业质量安全和环境安全问题研究[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2011(3): 5-7.Chen Z M.Research on quality and environmental safety of tea industry in China[J]. Quality and Safety of Agro-products, 2011(3): 5-7.
[3]	Zheng R R, Zhan J S, Liu L X, et al.Factors and minimal subsidy associated with tea farmers’ willingness to adopt ecological pest management[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(22): 6190. doi: 10.3390/su11226190.
[4]	He D C, Zhan J S, Xie L H.Problems, challenges and future of plant disease management: from an ecological point of view[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(4): 705-715.
[5]	吕秋霞, 程兆榜, 何敦春. 水稻条纹叶枯病流行风险源和影响指标[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(7): 104-107.Lv Q X, Chen Z B, He D C.Risk sources and influence indexes of rice stripe prevalence[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(7): 104-107.
[6]	Yang L N, Pan Z C, Zhu W, et al.Enhanced agricultural sustainability through within-species diversification[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2(1): 46-52.
[7]	谢联辉. 21世纪我国植物保护问题的若干思考[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2003, 5(5): 5-7.Xie L H.Some thoughts on plant protection in China in the 21st century[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2003, 5(5): 5-7.
[8]	蔡键, 唐忠. 要素流动、农户资源禀赋与农业技术采纳:文献回顾与理论解释[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2013(4): 68-77.Cai J, Tang Z.Factor flows, farmers' resource endowments and agricultural technology adoption: literature review and theoretical explanation[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2013(4): 68-77.
[9]	黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 农户认知、外部环境与绿色农业生产意愿: 基于湖北省632个农户调研数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(3): 680-687.Huang Y Z, Luo X F, Li R R, et al.Farmer Cognition,external environment and willingness of green agriculture production: based on the survey data of 632 farmers in Hubei Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(3): 680-687.
[10]	朱萌, 齐振宏, 邬兰娅, 等. 新型农业经营主体农业技术需求影响因素的实证分析: 以江苏省南部395户种稻大户为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2015(1): 30-38, 93-94.Zhu M, Qi Z H, Wu L Y, et al. Empirical analysis on factors of new agricultural business entities’ agricultural technology needs: taking 395 scaled rice farmers in southern Jiangsu Province as the example [J]. China Rural Survey, 2015(1): 30-38, 93-94.
[11]	吴林海, 侯博, 高申荣. 基于结构方程模型的分散农户农药残留认知与主要影响因素分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2011(3): 35-48.Wu L H, Hou B, Gao S R.Analysis on cognition and main influencing factors of pesticide residues of decentralized farmers based on structural equation model[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2011(3): 35-48.
[12]	赵肖柯, 周波. 种稻大户对农业新技术认知的影响因素分析: 基于江西省1077户农户的调查[J]. 中国农村观察, 2012(4): 29-36.Zhao X K, Zhou B. An analysis on factors influencing large-scale rice-plant farmers' cognition of up-to-date agriculture technology: based on the survey of1077 farmers in Jiangxi Province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2012(4): 29-36.
[13]	胡乃娟, 孙晓玲, 许雅婷, 等. 基于Logistic-ISM模型的农户有机肥施用行为影响因素及层次结构分解[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1120-1130.Hu N J, Sun X L, Xu Y T, et al.Influencing factors of farmers' organic fertilizer application behavior and their stratification based on Logistic-ISM model[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1120-1130.
[14]	吴雪莲, 张俊飚, 丰军辉. 农户绿色农业技术认知影响因素及其层级结构分解: 基于Probit-ISM模型[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(5): 36-45, 145.Wu X L, Zhang J B, Feng J H.Research on factors influencing farmers' cognition of green agricultural technologies and stratification: based logistic-ISM model[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2017(5): 36-45, 145.
[15]	吴强, 张园园, 孙世民. 基于Logit-ISM模型的奶农全面质量控制行为分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(3): 53-63.Wu Q, Zhang Y Y, Sun S M.Analysis of dairy farmers' total quality control behavior based on Logit-ISM model[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017(3): 53-63.
[16]	葛继红, 徐慧君, 杨森, 等. 基于Logit-ISM模型的污染企业周边农户环保支付意愿发生机制分析: 以苏皖两省为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2017(2): 93-106.Ge J H, Xu H J, Yang S, et al.The WTP of rural households nearby polluting enterprises using Logit and interpretive structural modeling: examples from Jiangsu and Anhui Provinces[J]. China Rural Survey, 2017(2): 93-106.
[17]	吕美晔, 王凯. 山区农户绿色农产品生产的意愿研究: 安徽皖南山区茶叶生产的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2004(5): 33-37.Lv M H, Wang K.A study on the willingness of farmers in mountainous areas to produce green agricultural products: an empirical analysis of tea production in southern Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2004(5): 33-37.
[18]	胡林英, 杜佩, 陈富桥, 等. 茶农绿色防控技术采用行为影响因素实证研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2017, 37(3): 308-314.Hu L Y, Du P, Chen F Q, et al.An empirical study on the impact factors of adoption of green prevention and control technology by tea-growers[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2017, 37(3): 308-314.
[19]	中国产业信息网. 福建省茶叶市场特征分析[EB/OL]. (2016-01-07)[2019-09-11]. http://www.chyxx.com/industry/China Industry Information Network. Analysis on the characteristics of tea market in Fujian Province [EB/OL]. (2016-01-07)[2019-09-11]. http://www.chyxx.com/ industry
[20]	谢联辉, 林奇英, 徐学荣. 植病经济与病害生态治理[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2005, 10(4): 39-42.Xie L H, Lin Q Y, Xu X R.Plant disease economy and ecologic management of plant diseases[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2005, 10(4): 39-42.
[21]	李莎莎, 朱一鸣, 马骥. 农户对测土配方施肥技术认知差异及影响因素分析: 基于11个粮食主产省2172户农户的调查[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2015, 30(7): 94-100.Li S S, Zhu Y M, Ma J.Analysis on the cognitive differences on soil testing and formulated fertilization technology and its reason: base on the survey of 2172 farmer household from 11 provinces[J]. Statistics &Information Forum, 2015, 30(7): 94-100.
[22]	Hashemi S M, Damalas C.Farmers' perceptions of pesticide efficacy: reflections on the importance of pest management practices adoption[J]. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2010, 35(1): 69-85.

基于Logistic-ISM模型的茶农采纳病虫生态调控技术的影响因素及层次结构分析

Analysis on the Impact Factors and Hierarchical Structure of the Farmers’ Adoption of Tea Ecological Pest Management by Logistic-ISM Model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张凯丽, 李湘. 青砖茶感官特性与生理活性研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(3): 361-378.
[2]	杜茜雅, 刘馨秋, 卢勇. 长江流域茶叶产地历史变迁及其影响因素[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(4): 694-706.
[3]	邹佳婷, 郭宇航, 边磊, 罗宗秀, 李兆群, 修春丽, 付楠霞, 蔡晓明. 化学农药对茶小绿叶蝉成虫的防效及其原因探究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(4): 544-552.
[4]	余文权, 王峰, 陈玉真, 单睿阳, 尤志明, 臧春荣, 陈常颂. 福建省典型茶园土壤硒含量及其影响因素研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(2): 173-185.
[5]	徐佳佳, 广敏, 史书林, 郜红建. 茶树根系跨膜吸收氟的生理与分子机制[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019, 39(4): 365-371.
[6]	林梦星, 陈富桥, 杜佩, 姜爱芹, 姜仁华. 茶叶企业电子商务经营效率及其影响因素分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 461-468.
[7]	胡林英, 杜佩, 陈富桥, 姜爱芹, 姜仁华, 鲁成银. 茶农绿色防控技术采用行为影响因素实证研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2017, 37(3): 308-314.
[8]	陈寿松, 郑功宇, 金心怡, 郝志龙, 叶秋萍, 赖智龙. 茶叶含水率近红外在线快速测定及其应用研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(4): 337-343.
[9]	江用文, 陈霄雄, 朱建淼, 杨双旭. 中国茶产业2020年发展规模分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2011, 31(3): 273-282.
[10]	杨亦扬, 马立锋, 石元值, 阮建云, 黎星辉. 叶绿素仪（SPAD）在茶树氮素营养诊断中的适用性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2008, 28(4): 301-308.
[11]	王云, 李春华, 周正科, 杨亮材, 侯渝嘉. 扁形名茶氨基酸含量的影响因素[J]. 茶叶科学, 1995, 15(02): 121-126.