一株茶树根际细菌的鉴定与生防效果研究

茶叶科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 87-100.

一株茶树根际细菌的鉴定与生防效果研究

朱咏珊¹, 罗晓欣¹, 梁浩然⁴, 陈正桐⁴, 刘成³, 曹凯³, 刘少群², 周而勋¹, 舒灿伟¹, 郑鹏^2,*

1.华南农业大学植物保护学院/广东省微生物信号与作物病害防控重点实验室/群体微生物研究中心,广东广州 510642;
2.华南农业大学园艺学院,广东广州 510642;
3.海峡两岸农业发展研究院,广东珠海 519080;
4.华南农业大学农学院,广东广州 510642

收稿日期:2021-09-03 修回日期:2021-10-30 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-18
通讯作者: *zhengp@scau.edu.cn
作者简介:朱咏珊,女,本科生,主要从事生物防治研究,13533617512@163.com。
基金资助:
广东省自然科学基金（2021A1515012091）、广州市科技计划（202102020290）、广东省重点领域研发计划（2019B020218009）

Identification of a Tea Rhizosphere Bacterium and its Biocontrol of Tea Anthracnose Disease

ZHU Yongshan¹, LUO Xiaoxin¹, LIANG Haoran⁴, CHEN Zhengtong⁴, LIU Cheng³, CAO Kai³, LIU Shaoqun², ZHOU Erxun¹, SHU Canwei¹, ZHENG Peng^2,*

1. College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University/Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control/Integrative Microbiology Research Center, Guangzhou 510642, China;
2. College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;
3. Cross-strait Agricultural Development Research Institute, Zhuhai 519080, China;
4. College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Received:2021-09-03 Revised:2021-10-30 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 炭疽病是茶树的重要病害之一,对茶叶的生长和产量造成严重的危害。目前该病的防治主要依靠化学药剂,开发生物防治产品是推广茶树绿色防控技术主要措施之一。用生理生化特征分析和分子生物学技术鉴定一株茶树根际生防菌JT68,评估其对茶炭疽病菌的抑菌效果以及菌液对菌丝生长和孢子萌发的影响。用对扣法检测该菌株的挥发性有机物对茶炭疽菌的抑制效果,并鉴定有机物的成分。用离体叶片接种的方法测试了菌液对炭疽病的防效。鉴定结果表明,菌株JT68为解淀粉芽孢杆菌。JT68菌液对茶炭疽病菌的平板抑制率为80.94%,对孢子萌发抑制率为99.18%。其发酵液富含细胞壁降解酶,处理菌丝后使病菌菌丝萎缩变形和产生厚垣孢子。JT68菌株产生的挥发性有机物对茶炭疽菌的抑菌率为50.73%,GC-MS检测发现挥发物中主要含有酮类物质。离体接种结果表明,菌液稀释100倍、稀释10倍和原液对炭疽菌相对抑制率分别为72.66%、79.70%和83.20%。抑菌谱试验表明该菌株对稻瘟病、香蕉枯萎病、辣椒炭疽病菌、希金斯炭疽菌、大丽轮枝菌和齐整小核菌等6种植物病原菌抑菌率达到70.0%~93.2%。本研究鉴定的茶树根际解淀粉芽孢杆菌,具有优越的防治病害效果,目前已经投入生产,用于制备茶树专用叶面肥并推广应用,该产品的使用可以替代或减少化学农药的使用,实现茶树的绿色防控。

关键词: 茶树炭疽菌, 解淀粉芽孢杆菌, 抑菌作用, 生物防治

Abstract: Tea anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) is one of the most important fungal diseases of Camellia sinensis worldwide, which causes serious damage to tea growth and production. The control of tea anthracnose is mainly dependent on chemical fungicides. To promote green prevention and control in tea plantation, development of biocontrol agents is critically important. A bacterium named JT68 isolated from tea rhizosphere was identified based on physiological and biochemical analysis and PCR. The inhibition effects of fermented broth JT68 on confrontation culture, mycelia growth and spores germination were determined. The effect of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of JT68 was tested and the components were identified by GC-MS. The control effect of JT68 was determined using detached leaf method. The results of this study shows that the strain JT68 was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Plate confrontation shows that the inhibition rate of fermentation broth of JT68 against C. gloeosporioides was 80.94%. Co-culture shows that the inhibition rate of spore germination of C. gloeosporioides was 99.18%, and the mycelia of pathogen shrank and formed chlamydospores. The VOCs of JT68 could inhibit 50.73% mycelia growth of C. gloeosporioides. Ketones such as 2-Nonanone and 2-Undecanone were revealed as major components in VOC through GC-MS analysis. Leaf detached inoculation shows that the relative inhibition rates of the original fermentation broth, 10-fold, and 100-fold dilutions were 83.20%, 79.70% and 72.66%, respectively. Furthermore, our study found that JT68 strongly inhibited the growth of Magnaporthe grisea, Fusarium oxysporum, C. capsici, C. higginsianum, Verticillium dahlia and Sclerotium rolfsii with the inhibition rates of 70.0%- 93.2%. Our study provided a biocontrol agent B. amyloliquefaciens from tea rhizosphere, which showed superior biocontrol effect against C. gloeosporioides. This strain had been applied to develop biofertilizer and widely used in the field, which would reduce the use of chemical fungicide and implement prevention and control in tea plantation.

Key words: tea anthracnose, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, inhibition effect, biological control

中图分类号:

S571.1

朱咏珊, 罗晓欣, 梁浩然, 陈正桐, 刘成, 曹凯, 刘少群, 周而勋, 舒灿伟, 郑鹏. 一株茶树根际细菌的鉴定与生防效果研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(1): 87-100.

ZHU Yongshan, LUO Xiaoxin, LIANG Haoran, CHEN Zhengtong, LIU Cheng, CAO Kai, LIU Shaoqun, ZHOU Erxun, SHU Canwei, ZHENG Peng. Identification of a Tea Rhizosphere Bacterium and its Biocontrol of Tea Anthracnose Disease[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2022, 42(1): 87-100.

参考文献

[1] Ponmurugan P, Baby U I, Rajkumar R.Growth, photosynthetic and biochemical responses of tea cultivars infected with various diseases[J]. Photosynthetica, 2007, 45(1): 143-146.
[2] Wang Y C, Hao X Y, Wang L, et al.Diverse Colletotrichum species cause anthracnose of tea plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 35287. doi: 10.1038/srep35287.
[3] 唐美君. 茶炭疽病的识别与防治[J]. 中国茶叶, 2019, 41(4): 6-8.
Tang M J.Identification and control of tea anthrax[J]. China Tea, 2019, 41(4): 6-8.
[4] Wang Y C, Qian W J, Li N N, et al.Metabolic changes of caffeine in tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) as defense response to Colletotrichum fructicola[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(35): 6685-6693.
[5] 吴庆丽, 秦刚, 李慧, 等. 助剂激健与杀菌剂混用对3种茶树病害的防效[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(8): 69-71.
Wu Q L, Qin G, Li H, et al.The effect of the mixture of adjuvant Jijian' and fungicides against three diseases on tea[J]. China Plant Protection, 2020, 40(8): 69-71.
[6] 郭迟鸣, 林文珍, 汪文华, 等. 不同生物药剂对茶炭疽病菌和茶轮斑病菌的室内毒力测定[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(12): 116-117.
Guo C M, Lin W Z, Wang W H, et al.Toxicity Measurement of Different Biological Reagents on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Pseudopestalotiopsis camelliae-sinensis[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(12): 116-117.
[7] 向晓龙, 杨文, 刘惠芳, 等. 香茅醇不同旋光异构体对抑制茶炭疽病病菌活性的比较及其协同作用[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019, 39(4): 425-430.
Xiang X L, Yang W, Liu H F, et al.Fungicidal activity comparison and synergetic effect of citronellol optical isomers against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2019, 39(4): 425-430.
[8] 刘昌霖. 攸县油茶炭疽病病原菌的分离鉴定与其寄主的互作分析[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2020.
Liu C L.Isolation and identification of anthracnose pathogen from Camellia yuhsienensis H.H.Hu and analysis of its host interaction [D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2020.
[9] Sowndhararajan K, Marimuthu S, Manian S.Biocontrol potential of phylloplane bacterium Ochrobactrum anthropi BMO-111 against blister blight disease of tea[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2013, 114(1): 209-218.
[10] Dhar P G, Mangar P, Saha A, et al.Evaluation of the biocontrol efficacy of a Serratia marcescens strain indigenous to tea rhizosphere for the management of root rot disease in tea[J]. Plos One, 2018, 13(2): e191761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191761.
[11] Viswanatham E, Kolandasamy M, Ponnusa P, et al.Evaluation of Streptomyces spp. for effective management of Poria hypolateritia causing red root-rot disease in tea plants[J]. Biological Control, 2015, 89: 75-83.
[12] 宋培玲, 燕孟娇, 张键, 等. 不同杀菌剂对油菜黑胫病菌分生孢子萌发及菌丝生长的抑制作用[J]. 北方农业学报, 2018, 46(3): 70-75.
Song P L, Yan M J, Zhang J, et al.Inhibition of different fungicides on conidia germination and mycelial growth of Leptosphaeria biglobosa[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2018, 46(3): 70-75.
[13] 古丽皮艳, 韩青梅, 王兰, 等. 不同杀菌剂对玉米弯孢叶斑病菌的毒力测定[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(s1): 49-52.
Gulipiya, Han Q M, Wang L, et al. Determination of different fungicidesʾ effect on Curvularia lunata[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2005, 33(s1): 49-52.
[14] Wang J, Cheung W, Leung D.Determination of pesticide residue transfer rates (percent) from dried tea leaves to brewed tea[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2014, 62(4): 966-983.
[15] Cao Y L, Tang H, Chen D Z, et al. A novel method based on MSPD for simultaneous determination of 16 pesticide residues in tea by LC-MS/MS [J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2015, 998/999: 72-79.
[16] Zhang X Z, Cui X, Wang X R, et al.Residue dissipation, transfer and safety evaluation of picoxystrobin during tea growing and brewing[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2020, 101(1): 194-204.
[17] Nobutaka S.Biological control of fungal plant diseases using antagonistic bacteria[J]. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 2008, 74(6): 459-460.
[18] Choudhary D K, Johri B N.Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants: with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR)[J]. Microbiol Res, 2009, 164(5): 493-513.
[19] Qin Y X, Han Y Z, Yu Y Q, et al.Complete genome sequence of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens L-S60, a plant growth-promoting and antifungal bacterium[J]. J Biotechnol, 2015, 212: 67-68.
[20] Gowtham H G, Murali M, Singh S B, et al.Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria-Bacillus amyloliquefaciens improves plant growth and induces resistance in chilli against anthracnose disease[J]. Biological Control, 2018, 126: 209-217.
[21] 梁丽琼, 黄少莉, 邵杭, 等. 水稻基腐病菌拮抗菌解淀粉芽孢杆菌E3菌株的鉴定及抑菌活性[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 51-62.
Liang L Q, Huang S L, Shao H, et al.Identification of an antagonistic strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens E3 against Dickeya zeae and its antimicrobial activity[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2021, 42(4): 51-62.
[22] 陆景倩, 郎剑锋, 杨秋侠, 等. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌对植物土传病害的作用机制[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(12): 5-10.
Lu J Q, Lang J F, Yang Q X, et al.Mechanism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on plant soil-borne disease[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 60(12): 5-10.
[23] Sietske A, Diderichsen B.On the safety of Bacillus subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens: a review[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1991, 36(1): 1-4.
[24] David J A.Fungal cell wall chitinases and glucanases[J]. Microbiology, 2004, 150(7): 2029-2035.
[25] Anupama S, Razia S, Jong-chan C, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis C25 which is rich in cell wall degrading enzymes efficiently controls lettuce drop caused by Sclerotinia minor[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2015, 142(3): 577-589.
[26] Harish S, Manjula K, Podile A R.Fusarium udum is resistant to the mycolytic activity of a biocontrol strain of Bacillus subtilis AF 1[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1998, 25(4): 385-390.
[27] Li Y, Guo Q, Wei X, et al.Biocontrol effects of Penicillium griseofulvum against monkshood (Aconitum carmichaelii Debx.) root diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsiii and Fusarium spp.[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2019, 127(5): 1532-1545.
[28] 宋利沙, 蒋妮, 张占江, 等. 草珊瑚炭疽病拮抗细菌的鉴定及其抑菌机理[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(10): 3266-3276.
Song L S, Jiang N, Zhang Z J, et al.Identification of antagonistic bacteria against anthracnose of Sarcandra glabra[J]. Microbiology China, 2020, 47(10): 3266-3276.
[29] 李艳玲, 宋阿琳, 卢玉秋, 等. 不同土壤玉米根际挥发性有机物组成和微生物群落特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(10): 1633-1645.
Li Y L, Song A L, Lu Y Q, et al.Volatile organic compound compositions and microbial community properties in maize rhizosphere among different soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(10): 1633-1645.
[30] 李娟. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌TJ抑菌物质的研究[D]. 天津: 天津农学院, 2015.
Li J.Study on the antifungal substance of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Agricultural University, 2015.
[31] Gotor-Vila A, Teixidó N, Di Francesco A, et al.Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CPA-8 against fruit pathogen decays of cherry[J]. Food Microbiology, 2017, 64: 219-225.
[32] 赵月菊, 刘阳, 王瑶, 等, 2-壬醇在抑制禾谷镰刀菌中的应用: CN201610217256.7[P].2017-10-20 [2021-09-03].
Zhao Y J, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al, Application of 2-nonanol in the inhibition of Fusarium graminearum: CN201610217256.7 [P].2017-10-20 [2021-09-03].
[33] Yuan J, Raza W, Shen Q R, et al.Antifungal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 volatile compounds against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(16): 5942-5944.