抗小贯松村叶蝉和茶棍蓟马的茶树种质筛选及其抗性相关因素分析

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2022.05.007

茶叶科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 689-704.doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2022.05.007

抗小贯松村叶蝉和茶棍蓟马的茶树种质筛选及其抗性相关因素分析

孙悦^1,2, 吴俊^1,2, 韦朝领³, 刘梦月^1,2,4, 高晨曦^1,2,4, 张灵枝^1,2,4, 曹士先⁵, 余顺甜⁵, 金珊^1,*, 孙威江^1,2,4,*

1.福建农林大学园艺学院,福建福州 350002;
2.海峡两岸特色作物安全生产省部共建协同创新中心,福建福州350002;
3.安徽农业大学,安徽合肥 230036;
4.福建省茶叶工程技术研究中心,福建福州 350002;
5.武夷星茶业有限公司,福建武夷山 354301

收稿日期:2022-03-07 修回日期:2022-07-06 出版日期:2022-10-15 发布日期:2022-10-28
通讯作者: * jinshan0313@163.com;swj8103@126.com
作者简介:孙悦,女,硕士研究生,主要从事茶树栽培育种与生物技术方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划专项课题（2019YFD1001601）、福建农林大学“双一流”建设科技创新能力提升培育计划项目（KSYLC005）、福建张天福茶叶发展基金会科技创新基金（FJZTF01）

Screening of Tea Germplasm Resistant to Matsumurasca onukii and Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Analysis of Resistance-related Factors

SUN Yue^1,2, WU Jun^1,2, WEI Chaoling³, LIU Mengyue^1,2,4, GAO Chenxi^1,2,4, ZHANG Lingzhi^1,2,4, CAO Shixian⁵, YU Shuntian⁵, JIN Shan^1,*, SUN Weijiang^1,2,4,*

1. College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2. Ministerial and Provincial Joint Innovation Centre for Safety Production of Cross-Strait Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
3. Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China;
4. Engineering Technology and Research Center of Fujian Tea Industry, Fuzhou 350002, China;
5. Wuyi Star Tea Industrial Company Limited, Wuyishan 354301, China

Received:2022-03-07 Revised:2022-07-06 Online:2022-10-15 Published:2022-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨不同茶树品种对小贯松村叶蝉（Matsumurasca onukii）和茶棍蓟马（Dendrothrips minowai Priesner）的抗性,为抗虫茶树品种的选育和推广提供科学依据。以11个茶树品种紫娟、水仙、梅占、白鸡冠、瑞香、奇兰、黄玫瑰、白牡丹、黄棪、大红袍、黄观音为供试材料,采用五点取样法对田间种群密度进行调查,并进行茶树植物学形态特征调查,以及叶片组织结构测定、化学成分检测,明确茶树物理性状、化学成分与抗虫性之间的相关性。结果显示,按抗小贯松村叶蝉的强弱,11个茶树品种可分为4类,第Ⅰ类：紫娟,感虫（S）;第Ⅱ类：梅占、黄棪、奇兰、水仙、白牡丹,中感（MS）;第Ⅲ类：瑞香、大红袍、黄观音、黄玫瑰,中抗（MR）;第Ⅳ类：白鸡冠,抗（R）。按抗茶棍蓟马的强弱也可将其分为4类,第Ⅰ类：黄玫瑰,感虫（S）;第Ⅱ类：瑞香、白鸡冠,中感（MS）;第Ⅲ类：黄观音、奇兰,中抗（MR）;第Ⅳ类：白牡丹、黄棪、大红袍、梅占、紫娟、水仙,抗（R）。结合相关分析显示,小贯松村叶蝉总虫口数与11个茶树品种的花青素含量、GCG含量呈极显著正相关（P<0.01）,与上角质层厚度/叶片厚度、下角质层厚度/叶片厚度呈显著正相关（P<0.05）,而与游离氨基酸总量、栅栏组织厚度、上表皮厚度、上表皮厚度/叶片厚度呈显著负相关（P<0.05）。叶长与茶棍蓟马总发生量呈显著负相关（P<0.05）,且小贯松村叶蝉的总虫口数与茶棍蓟马总虫口数显著负相关（P<0.05）。综合分析得出,大红袍茶树品种和黄观音茶树品种对小贯松村叶蝉和茶棍蓟马均存在一定抗性,是值得推广的茶树良种。调查结果还发现小贯松村叶蝉和茶棍蓟马之间存在同期交替为害茶树的现象。

关键词: 茶树, 小贯松村叶蝉, 茶棍蓟马, 抗虫机理, 种质筛选

Abstract: The resistance of different tea cultivars against Matsumurasca onukii and Dendrothrips minowai Priesner was explored to provide a scientific basis for the breeding and promotion of insect resistant tea cultivars. Taking 11 tea cultivars (Zijuan, Shuixian, Meizhan, Baijiguan, Ruixiang, Qilan, Huangguanyin, Baimudan, Huangyuanyin, Dahongpao and Huangguanyin) as the test materials, the field population was investigated by five-point sampling method. Through investigation of field population density and tea plant morphological characteristics, determination of leaf tissue structure and detection of chemical composition, the relationship among physical properties, chemical components and insect resistance of tea plants was analyzed. The results show that 11 tea cultivars could be divided into 4 categories according to their resistance to M. onukii. category Ⅰ: Zijuan, insect-susceptible (S), category Ⅱ: Meizhan, Huangdan, Qilan, Shuixian, Baimudan, middle susceptible (MS), category Ⅲ: Ruixiang, Dahongpao, Huang guanyin, Huangmeigui, middle resistant (MR), category Ⅳ: Baijiguan, resistant (R). According to the strength of resistance to D. minowai Priesner, it can also be divided into 4 categories, category Ⅰ: Huangmeigui, insect-susceptible (S), category Ⅱ: Ruixiang, Baijiguan, moderate sensitivity (MS), category Ⅲ: Huang Guanyin, Qilan, middle resistant (MR), category Ⅳ: Baimudan, Huangdan, Dahongpao, Meizhan, Zijuan, Shuixian, resistant (R). Combined with correlation analysis, the total number of M. onukii was highly significantly and positively correlated with the anthocyanin content and GCG content of 11 tea cultivars (P<0.01), and significantly and positively correlated with upper cuticle thickness/leaf thickness and lower cuticle thickness/leaf thickness (P<0.05). However, it was significantly and negatively correlated with free amino acids, palisade tissue thickness, upper epidermis thickness and upper epidermis thickness/leaf thickness (P<0.05). There was a significantly negative correlation between leaf length and the total number of D. minowai Priesner (P<0.05), and the total number of M. onukii was significantly and negatively correlated with the total number of D. minowai Priesner (P<0.05). After comprehensive evaluation, the tea cultivars of Dahongpao and Huangguanyin have certain resistance to M. onukii and D. minowai Priesner, which are worthy of promotion. Meanwhile, there was a phenomenon that M. onukii and D. minowai Priesner alternately damage the tea plants in the same period.

Key words: tea plant, Matsumurasca onukii, Dendrothrips minowai Priesner, resistance mechanism, germplasm screening

中图分类号:

孙悦, 吴俊, 韦朝领, 刘梦月, 高晨曦, 张灵枝, 曹士先, 余顺甜, 金珊, 孙威江. 抗小贯松村叶蝉和茶棍蓟马的茶树种质筛选及其抗性相关因素分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(5): 689-704. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2022.05.007.

SUN Yue, WU Jun, WEI Chaoling, LIU Mengyue, GAO Chenxi, ZHANG Lingzhi, CAO Shixian, YU Shuntian, JIN Shan, SUN Weijiang. Screening of Tea Germplasm Resistant to Matsumurasca onukii and Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Analysis of Resistance-related Factors[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2022, 42(5): 689-704. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2022.05.007.

参考文献

[1] 李红莉, 崔宏春, 黄海涛, 等. 联苯菊酯等4种杀虫剂对茶小贯小绿叶蝉的田间防效[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(3): 565-566.
Li H L, Cui H C, Huang H T, et al.Control effects of four insecticides including bifenthrin on Empoasca (Matsumurasca) onukii in field[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 62(3): 565-566.
[2] 彭亚琦, 张悦怡, 刘瑞, 等. 提高30%茶皂素水剂对小贯小绿叶蝉田间防治效果的研究[J/OL]. 湖北大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(6). doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2375.2022.00.007.
Peng Y Q, Zhang Y Y, Liu R, et al.Research on improving the controlling effect of 30% tea saponin water aqueous solution against Empoasca onukii in the field [J/OL]. Journal of Hubei University (Natural Science), 2022, 44(6). doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2375.2022.00.007.
[3] 刘惠芳, 杨文, 陈瑶, 等. 4种杀虫剂对茶棍蓟马的防效及其在茶树上的残留动态[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(12): 48-51.
Liu H F, Yang W, Chen Y, et al.Control effect of four pesticides against Dendrothrips minowai and their residual dynamics in tea[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(12): 48-51.
[4] 汪勇, 朱飞, 陆远强, 等. 茶棍蓟马防治试验[J]. 吉林农业, 2010(12): 105.
Wang Y, Zhu F, Lu Y Q, et al.Control test of Dendrothrips minowai Priesner[J]. Jilin Agriculture, 2010(12): 105.
[5] 彭文书, 季爱兵, 刘聪, 等. “生物肥皂”脂肪酸盐防治茶黑毒蛾、假眼小绿叶蝉和茶黄蓟马的田间药效试验[J]. 中国茶叶加工, 2016(5): 45-49.
Peng W S, Ji A B, Liu C, et al.The effect evaluation of “Biological Soap” fatty acid salt for preventing and controlling the Dasychira baibarana Matsumura, Empoasca vitis and Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood in the tea plantation[J]. China Tea Processing, 2016(5): 45-49.
[6] 农红艳, 黎书辉, 黎健龙, 等. 茶园蓟马的绿色防控技术研究进展[J]. 广东茶业, 2020(2): 5-9.
Nong H Y, Li S H, Li J L, et al.Research progress on green prevention and control technology of thrips in tea garden[J]. Guangdong Tea Industry, 2020(2): 5-9.
[7] 李飞, 杨丹, 郑姣莉, 等. 中国茶园主要害虫生物防治研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(10): 5-9, 22.
Li F, Yang D, Zheng J L, et al.Research advances in biological control of tea pests in China[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 59(10): 5-9, 22.
[8] Cai X M, Xu X X, Bian L, et al.Attractiveness of host volatiles combined with background visual cues to the tea leafhopper, Empoasca vitis[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2015, 157(3): 291-299.
[9] 张余杰, 陈文龙, 杨琳, 等. 小贯小绿叶蝉的化防农药及其抗药性发展状况[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(4): 239-245.
Zhang Y J, Chen W L, Yang L, et al.Pesticides in chemical control and resistance development ofEmpoasca onukii[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(4): 239-245.
[10] 刘丰静, 冉伟, 李喜旺, 等. 小贯小绿叶蝉在5个茶树品种(系)上的蜜露排泄量与茶树叶片结构比较[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(5): 625-631.
Liu F J, Ran W, Li X W, et al.The comparison of leaf structures and Matsumurasca onukii honeydew excretion among five tea cultivars (strains)[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(5): 625-631.
[11] 邹武, 林乃铨, 王庆森. 福建主要茶树品种理化特性与假眼小绿叶蝉种群数量的相关性分析[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2006, 15(2): 129-134.
Zou W, Lin N Q, Wang Q S.Correlationships between physical and biochemical leaf characteristics of 4 tea varieties and the population of Empoasca vitis[J]. Entomological Journal of East China, 2006, 15(2): 129-134.
[12] 孟泽洪, 李帅, 杨文, 等. 锉吸有痕的茶棍蓟马[J]. 中国茶叶, 2019, 41(12): 20-22.
Meng Z H, Li S, Yang W, et al.Dendrothrips minowai Priesner with suction marks[J]. China Tea, 2019, 41(12): 20-22.
[13] 彭萍, 王晓庆, 李品武. 茶树病虫害测报与防治技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
Peng P, Wang X Q, Li P W.Prediction and control technology of tea tree diseases and insect pests [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2013.
[14] 贺伯虎. 茶棍蓟马发生特点及防治措施[J]. 植物医生, 2016, 29(12): 70-71.
He B H.Occurrence characteristics and control measures of Dendrothrips minowai Priesner[J]. Plant Doctor, 2016, 29(12): 70-71.
[15] 金珊, 孙晓玲, 陈宗懋, 等. 不同茶树品种对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(2): 255-265.
Jin S, Sun X L, Chen Z M, et al.Resistance of different tea cultivars to Empoasca vitis Gothe[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(2): 255-265.
[16] 王玉春, 肖斌, 谢奇, 等. 陕西茶区小贯小绿叶蝉种群动态及寄主抗虫性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(7): 43-49.
Wang Y C, Xiao B, Xie Q, et al.Population dynamics of Empoasca onukii and host resistance in tea production region in Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2013, 22(7): 43-49.
[17] Sun Q Y, Chen W L, Ge C M, et al.Correlation of tea green leafhopper occurrence with leaf structure and biochemical components in different tea cultivars[J]. International Journal of Pest Management, 2020(1): 1-11.
[18] 杨春, 孟泽洪, 李帅, 等. 贵州茶园茶棍蓟马和小贯小绿叶蝉种群动态及主栽茶树品种寄主抗性[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(3): 671-681.
Yang C, Meng Z H, Li S, et al.Population dynamics of Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Empoasca onukii Matsuda and host resistance of major tea varieties in Guizhou[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2021, 52(3): 671-681.
[19] 苗进, 韩宝瑜. 假眼小绿叶蝉(Empoasca vitis Gothe)在不同品种茶树上的取食行为[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10): 3973-3982.
Miao J, Han B Y.The probing behavior of the tea green leafhopper on different tea plant cultivars[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(10): 3973-3982.
[20] 刘丽芳, 徐德良, 穆丹, 等. EPG技术分析不同品种茶树抗假眼小绿叶蝉取食行为的差异[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2011, 38(2): 281-286.
Liu L F, Xu D L, Mu D, et al.Analysis of the feeding behaviours of tea green leafhoppers on resistant to sensible cultivars of tea plants by electrical penetration graphy techniques[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2011, 38(2): 281-286.
[21] 郑雨婷, 王梦馨, 崔林, 等. 基于EPG技术分析茶树品种对茶小绿叶蝉的抗性及其相关的抗性物质[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(23): 8015-8028.
Zheng Y T, Wang M X, Cui L, et al.Resistance of tea cultivars to the tea green leafhopper analyzed by EPG technique and their resistance-related substances[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(23): 8015-8028.
[22] Alves G R, Diniz A J F, Parra J R P. Biology of the Huanglongbing Vector Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) on different host plants[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2014, 107(2): 691-696.
[23] 金奇年, 王娅玲, 雷小涛, 等. 扶桑绵粉蚧对四种水生蔬菜的选择性及取食后蜜露分泌量的研究[J]. 湖北植保, 2021(3): 29-31, 34.
Jin Q N, Wang Y L, Lei X T, et al.Study on the selectivity of four kinds of aquatic vegetables and the secretion of honeydew after feeding by the Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley[J]. Hubei Plant Protection, 2021(3): 29-31, 34.
[24] 姚雍静, 卢天国, 郭灿, 等. 植物浸提液防治茶棍蓟马药效试验初报[J]. 贵州茶叶, 2010(3): 3.
Yao Y J, Lu T G, Guo C, et al.Preliminary report on efficacy of plant extracts prevention Dendrothrips minowai Prieser[J]. Guizhou Tea, 2010(3): 3.
[25] 李慧玲, 张辉, 王定锋, 等. 不同悬挂高度数字化色板对茶棍蓟马的诱集效果试验[J]. 茶叶科学技术, 2014(4): 45-46, 52.
Li H L, Zhang H, Wang D F, et al.Effects of different suspending heights of digital color boards on trapping Dendrothrips minowai Priesner[J]. Tea Science and Technology, 2014(4): 45-46, 52.
[26] 许梦华, 王敏鑫, 邵元海. 不同颜色色板对茶棍蓟马的诱集效果试验[J]. 茶叶, 2016, 42(4): 197-198.
Xu M H, Wang M X, Shao Y H.Effect of different digital colour boards on trapping Dendrothrips minowai Priesner[J]. Journal of Tea, 2016, 42(4): 197-198.
[27] 赵丰华, 李彩丽, 李平, 等. 茶树抗虫性研究进展[J]. 中国茶叶, 2015, 37(9): 20-23.
Zhao F H, Li C L, Li P, et al.Research progress on insect resistance of tea plants[J]. China Tea, 2015, 37(9): 20-23.
[28] 陈亮, 杨亚军, 虞富莲. 茶树茶树种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学出版社, 2005: 1-50.
Chen L, Yang Y J, Yu F L.Specifications and Data Standards for Tea Germplasm Resources [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science Press, 2005: 1-50.
[29] 赵俊, 木万福, 张志星. 植物石蜡切片技术改进[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2009, 15(5): 69, 90.
Zhao J, Mu W F, Zhang Z X. Improvement of plant paraffin section technical [J]. Auhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 15(5): 69, 90.
[30] 邹青松, 陈山, 王晓, 等. 瑶山甜茶可溶性糖的测定[J]. 食品工业科技, 2011, 32(1): 296-299.
Zou Q S, Chen S, Wang X, et al.Determination of soluble sugar in Yaoshan sweet tea[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2011, 32(1): 296-299.
[31] 袁华芳. 黑茶化学成分及其抗氧化性的研究[D]. 辽宁: 辽宁师范大学, 2008.
Yuan H F.Research of dark green tea's chemical composition and antioxidation [D]. Liaoning: Liaoning Normal University, 2008.
[32] 高晨曦, 黄艳, 李晶, 等. 茶树新梢内源激素与叶片色泽形成的调控关系研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2021, 41(6): 802-812.
Gao C X, Huang Y, Li J, et al.Research on the regulation relationship between endogenous hormones in tea shoots and leaf color formation[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2021, 41(6): 802-812.
[33] 姚雍静, 牟春林, 赵志清, 等. 施肥技术对两种主要茶梢害虫发生量影响的初步观察[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2011(3): 263-266.
Yao Y J, Mou C L, Zhao Z Q, et al.A preliminary investigation in the effect technique on the occurrence of two tea shoot pests[J]. Journal of Mountain Agricultural and Biology, 2011(3): 263-266.
[34] 曾莉, 王平盛, 许玫. 茶树对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2001, 21(2): 90-93.
Zeng L, Wang P S, Xu M.Study on tea resistance to Empoasca vitis Göthe[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2001, 21(2): 90-93.
[35] 叶火香, 韩善捷, 韩宝瑜. 假眼小绿叶蝉趋色性及茶梢信息物质强化其趋色性的效应[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2015, 42(6): 868-872.
Ye H X, Han S J, Han B Y.Phototaxis of tea green leafhopper and strengthening effect of infochemicals from tea shoots on its phototaxis[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2015, 42(6): 868-872.
[36] Halder J, Sanwal S K, Deb D, et al.Mechanisms of physical and biochemical basis of resistance against leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula ) in different okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) genotypes[J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 86(4): 481-484.
[37] Mohammad H A T, Nazrul I M, Zhang Y, et al. Leaf morphological characters can be a factor for Intra-Varietal Preference of Whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) among eggplant varieties[J]. PloS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153880. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153880.
[38] Bian L, Yang P X, Yao Y J, et al.Effect of trap color, height, and orientation on the capture of yellow and stick tea thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and nontarget insects in tea gardens[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2016, 109(3): 1241-1248.
[39] 林金丽, 韩宝瑜, 周孝贵, 等. 色彩对茶园昆虫的引诱力[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(8): 4303-4316.
Lin J L, Han B Y, Zhou X G, et al.Comparison of trapping efficacy of various colours for insects in tea gardens[J]. Acta Ecology Sinica, 2009, 29(8): 4303-4316.
[40] 金珊. 不同茶树品种抗假眼小绿叶蝉机理研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2012.
Jin S.Resistance mechanisms of tea plant cultivars to tea green leafhopper [D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2012.
[41] 张贻礼, 张觉晚, 杨阳, 等. 茶树抗虫品种资源调查及抗性机制研究——Ⅱ. 不同品种茶树特征特性对假眼小绿叶蝉抗性的相关分析[J]. 茶叶通讯, 1994(2): 4-6.
Zhang Y L, Zhang J W, Yang Y, et al.Investigation of insect resistant tea varieties and their resistance mechanism-Ⅱ. Correlation analysis of resistance of different tea varieties to Empoasca vitis[J]. Journal of Tea Communication, 1994(2): 4-6.
[42] 张莉, 杨春, 李帅, 等. 贵州中部地区茶园茶棍蓟马的空间分布[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(12): 52-54.
Zhang L, Yang C, Li S, et al.Spatial distribution pattern of Dendrothrips minowai in tea garden in central Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(12): 52-54.
[43] 杨云彩, 赵同贵, 莫熙礼. 黔西南茶树小贯小绿叶蝉绿色防控技术[J]. 农技服务, 2018, 35(6): 46-48.
Yang Y C, Zhao T G, Mo X L.Green prevention and control technology of Empoasca onukii Matsuda in southwestern Guizhou[J]. Agricultural Technology Service, 2018, 35(6): 46-48.
[44] 王蔚, 吴满容, 张思校. 茶小绿叶蝉在福建省茶树品种上的选择机制初探[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(4): 80-84.
Wang W, Wu M R, Zhang S X, et al.Preliminary study on selection mechanism of Empoasca onukii on tea varieties in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 45(4): 80-84.
[45] 刘建凤, 姚莹, 赵婕, 等. 沙棘抗虫性机制及其分子育种研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(8): 108-115.
Liu J F, Yao Y, Zhao J, et al.Mechanism of insect resistance of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) and progress on molecular breeding[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 108-115.
[46] 白万鹏, 李虎军, 刘林波, 等. 植物气孔与角质层蜡质响应非生物胁迫的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(22): 14-18, 46.
Bai W P, Li H J, Liu L B, et al.Research progress of plant stomata and cuticular wax in response to abiotic stress[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(22): 14-18, 46.
[47] 毛迎新, 邹武, 马新华, 等. 福建主要茶树品种间假眼小绿叶蝉种群动态及其抗虫性比较[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2009, 28(1): 16-19.
Mao Y X, Zou W, Ma X H, et al.Comparison of the population dynamics of Empoasca vitis (Gǒthe) on six tea varieties and their resistance to pests[J]. Journal of the Huazhong Agricultural University, 2009, 28(1): 16-19.
[48] Fan X P, Fan B H, Wang Y X, et al.Anthocyanin accumulation enhanced in Lc-transgenic cotton under light and increased resistance to bollworm[J]. Plant Biotechnol Reports, 2016, 10: 1-11.
[49] 李鑫. 陆地棉花青素合成调控基因的定位克隆和功能分析[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2020.
Li X.Map-based cloning and functional analysis of anthocyanin regulator genes in upland cotton [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2020.
[50] Sarma A D, Sreelakshmi Y, Sharma R.Antioxidant ability of anthocyanins against ascorbic acid oxidation[J]. Phytochemistroy, 1997, 45(4): 671-674.
[51] 黄凌晖. 不同品种羽衣甘蓝观赏性状、硫苷含量及抗虫性状研究[D]. 临安: 浙江农林大学, 2012.
Huang L H.Study on ornamental traits, glucosinolate profiles and insect resistance of different ornamental kale cultivars (Brassica Oleracea Var. Acephala F. Tricolor) [D]. Lin′an: Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, 2012.

抗小贯松村叶蝉和茶棍蓟马的茶树种质筛选及其抗性相关因素分析

Screening of Tea Germplasm Resistant to Matsumurasca onukii and Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Analysis of Resistance-related Factors

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王留彬, 黄丽蕴, 滕翠琴, 吴立赟, 成浩, 于翠平, 王丽鸳. 梧州茶树种质资源的遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(5): 601-609.
[2]	周汉琛, 杨霁虹, 徐玉婕, 吴琼, 雷攀登. 香叶醇生物合成相关基因NUDX1的进化分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(5): 638-648.
[3]	陈琪予, 马建强, 陈杰丹, 陈亮. 利用图像特征分析茶树成熟叶表型的遗传多样性[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(5): 649-660.
[4]	王玉源, 刘任坚, 刘少群, 舒灿伟, 孙彬妹, 郑鹏. 茶树R2R3-MYB转录因子CsTT2表达分析及功能初步鉴定[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(4): 463-476.
[5]	刘建军, 张金玉, 彭叶, 刘晓博, 杨云, 黄涛, 温贝贝, 李美凤. 不同光质摊青对夏秋茶树鲜叶挥发性物质及其绿茶品质影响研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(4): 500-514.
[6]	邢安琪, 武子辰, 徐晓寒, 孙怡, 王艮梅, 王玉花. 茶树富集氟的特点及其机制的研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(3): 301-315.
[7]	王涛, 王艺清, 漆思雨, 周喆, 陈志丹, 孙威江. 茶树CLH基因家族的鉴定与转录调控研究及其在白化茶树中的表达分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(3): 331-346.
[8]	刘任坚, 王玉源, 刘少群, 舒灿伟, 孙彬妹, 郑鹏. 茶树CsbHLH024和CsbHLH133转录因子功能鉴定[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(3): 347-357.
[9]	欧阳珂, 张成, 廖雪利, 坤吉瑞, 童华荣. 基于感官组学分析玉米香型南川大茶树工夫红茶特征香气[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(3): 397-408.
[10]	刘富浩, 范延艮, 王域, 孟凡月, 张丽霞. 茶树黄金芽CsHIPP26.1蛋白螯合离子的筛选与鉴定[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(2): 179-186.
[11]	杨妮, 李逸民, 李静文, 滕瑞敏, 陈益, 王雅慧, 庄静. 外源5-ALA对干旱胁迫下茶树叶绿素合成和荧光特性及关键酶基因表达的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(2): 187-199.
[12]	疏再发, 郑生宏, 邵静娜, 周慧娟, 吉庆勇, 刘瑜, 何卫中, 王丽鸳. 不同茶树品种（系）对减半施肥的响应研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(2): 277-289.
[13]	陈潇敏, 赵峰, 王淑燕, 邵淑贤, 吴文晞, 林钦, 王鹏杰, 叶乃兴. 福建野生茶树资源嘌呤生物碱构成评价及特异资源筛选[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(1): 18-28.
[14]	刘庆帅, 璩馥榕, 魏梦园, 钟红, 王熠, 陈亮, 金基强. 基于UPLC技术解析金萱×紫娟F₁分离群体代谢物的遗传变异[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(1): 29-40.
[15]	朱咏珊, 罗晓欣, 梁浩然, 陈正桐, 刘成, 曹凯, 刘少群, 周而勋, 舒灿伟, 郑鹏. 一株茶树根际细菌的鉴定与生防效果研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(1): 87-100.