茶树腐皮镰刀菌拮抗菌株的筛选鉴定及促生防病特性分析

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2023.01.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 腐皮镰刀菌（Fusarium solani）是可以引起茶树茎腐和枯萎的致病真菌。为获得对茶树腐皮镰刀菌有拮抗效果的生防菌株,从河南省信阳市新县茶园收集的茶树（Camellia sinensis）健康叶片中采用梯度稀释法分离纯化得到内生细菌56株,通过平板对峙法筛选对腐皮镰刀菌抑制效果较好的菌株,并根据形态特征、生理生化特征和分子生物学技术对其进行鉴定,测定其防病促生指标并进行抑菌谱试验,通过发酵液试验和平板对扣法评估挥发性物质对腐皮镰刀菌菌丝生长的影响。结果显示,筛选得到的菌株YB-1476对腐皮镰刀菌菌丝生长抑制率达到63.31%,拮抗效果最佳,鉴定其为贝莱斯芽孢杆菌（Bacillus velezensis）。该菌株有产铁载体和吲哚乙酸、分泌β-1,3-葡聚糖酶和纤维素酶及溶磷的能力。抑菌谱试验表明,菌株YB-1476对平脐蠕孢菌（Bipolaris sorokinana）、禾谷镰刀菌（Fusarium graminearum PH-1）、念珠状镰刀菌（Fusarium moniliforme）、尖孢镰刀菌（Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum）和茄链格孢菌（Alternaria solani）5种病原真菌的菌丝生长抑制率分别达到65.03%、42.32%、51.67%、52.33%和63.22%。发酵液原液、稀释10倍和稀释100倍发酵液对腐皮镰刀菌的菌丝生长抑制率分别为66.67%、51.85%和18.52%。菌株YB-1476产生的挥发性物质对腐皮镰刀菌的菌丝生长抑制率达到53.37%。以上结果表明,菌株YB-1476在防控茶树茎腐和枯萎病方面具有巨大应用潜力。

关键词: 腐皮镰刀菌, 茶树, 茎腐和枯萎病, 生物防治

Abstract: Fusarium solani is a pathogen that could cause collar canker and dieback of Camellia sinensis. To obtain strains with strong antagonistic activity against F. solani, a total of 56 endophytic strains were isolated and purified from healthy leaves of tea trees collected from a tea garden in Xinxian, Xinyang, Henan province by dilution plate method and were screened in dual cultures with F. solani. The strain was identified based on morphological characteristics, physiological, biochemical and molecular tests. Biocontrol and growth-promoting traits and antibacterial spectrum test were also detected. The effects on the mycelial growth of F. solani were evaluated by ferment product and volatile test by buckle culture. The results show that strain YB-1476 exhibited the strongest antagonistic activity against F. solani with growth inhibition rate of 63.31% and was identified as Bacillus velezensis. Strain YB-1476 could produce siderophore, indoleacetic acid, and be able to secrete β-1,3-glucanase, cellulase and solubilize phosphorus. Furthermore, strain YB-1476 displayed strong antagonistic activity against Bipolaris sorokinana, Fusarium graminearum PH-1, Fusarium moniliforme, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum and Alternaria solani and growth inhibition rates were 65.03%, 42.32%, 51.67%, 52.33% and 63.22%, respectively. In addition, ferment products show that the growth inhibition rates of the original fermentation broth, 10-fold, and 100-fold dilutions were 66.67%, 51.85%, 18.52%, respectively and the volatile test shows that growth inhibition rate against F. solani was 53.37%. The above results demonstrate that B. velezensis YB-1476 is a strain with great application potential to control collar canker and dieback of tea trees.

Key words: Fusarium solani, Camellia sinensis, collar canker and dieback, biocontrol

中图分类号:

邓晓旭, 谢夏, 潘娅梅, 赵丰华, 蒋双丰, 徐文, 张洁, 孙润红, 夏明聪, 杨丽荣. 茶树腐皮镰刀菌拮抗菌株的筛选鉴定及促生防病特性分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(1): 67-77. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2023.01.005.

DENG Xiaoxu, XIE Xia, PAN Yamei, ZHAO Fenghua, JIANG Shuangfeng, XU Wen, ZHANG Jie, SUN Runhong, XIA Mingcong, YANG Lirong. Screening and Identification of Strains against Fusarium solani Isolated from Camellia sinensis and Analysis of its Biocontrol and Growth Promotion Characteristics[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2023, 43(1): 67-77. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2023.01.005.

参考文献

[1] 朱咏珊, 罗晓欣, 梁浩然, 等. 一株茶树根际细菌的鉴定与生防效果研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(1): 87-100.
Zhu Y S, Luo X X, Liang H R, et al.Identification of a tea rhizosphere bacterium and its biocontrol of tea anthracnose disease[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2022, 42(1): 87-100.
[2] 王春晓, 高峰, 陈富桥, 等. “一带一路”倡议对中国茶叶出口的影响—基于渐进双重差分模型的实证分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2021, 41(6): 865-875.
Wang C X, Gao F, Chen F Q, et al.Did the “belt and road” initiative promote the export of China’s tea? —an empirical study based on the generalized DID[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2021, 41(6): 865-875.
[3] 王雪, 王勇, 尹桥秀, 等. 贵州省余庆县茶褐枯病病原菌的鉴定[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(2): 101-106.
Wang X, Wang Y, Yin Q X, et al.Identification of the pathogen of tea brown blight in Yuqing county, Guizhou province[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(2): 101-106.
[4] Chen Y J, Zeng L, Liang S N, et al.First report of Pestalotiopsis camelliae causing grey blight disease on Camellia sinensis in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2017, 101(6): 10-34.
[5] 赵晓珍, 王勇, 李冬雪, 等. 茶树新病害病原菌Phoma segeticola var.camelliae的形态学特征及系统学分析[J]. 植物病理学报, 2018, 48(4): 556-559.
Zhao X Z, Wang Y, Li D X, et al.Morphological characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the pathogen Phoma segeticola var. camelliae causing a new tea disease[J]. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2018, 48(4): 556-559.
[6] Kuberan T, Deng C, Cheng L L, et al.Report of Phoma herbarum causing leaf spot disease of Camellia sinensis in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2018, 102(1): 23-73.
[7] Xu W, Zhao F, Deng X X, et al.First report of collar canker and dieback of Camellia sinensis caused by Fusarium solani species complex in Henan, China[J]. Plant Disease, 2022, 106(8): 2263. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-21-1517-PDN.
[8] Sinniah G D, Munasinghe C E, Mahadevan N, et al.Recent incidence of collar canker and dieback of tea (Camellia sinensis) caused by Fusarium solani species complex in Sri Lanka[J]. Australasian Plant Disease, 2017, 12: 41. doi: 10.1007/s13314-017-0262-5.
[9] Satya R S, Pradip K B, Suresh C D.Practical utilization of botanical extracts and microbial in controlling dieback disease of tea [Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze] caused by Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc[J]. Journal of Tea Science Research, 2017, 17(2): 11-19.
[10] Wang Y C, Hao X Y, Wang L, et al.Diverse Colletotrichum species cause anthracnose of tea plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 35287. doi: 10.1038/srep35287.
[11] Wang Y C, Qian W J, Li N N, et al.Metabolic changes of caffeine in tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) as defense response to Colletotrichum fructicola[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(35): 6685-6693.
[12] 胡娴, 陈宸彤, 谢杨鋆, 等. 钩状木霉菌的生物学特性及对腐皮镰刀菌的抑菌机理研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(1): 81-87.
Hu X, Chen C T, Xie Y J, et al.Study on biological characteristics of Trichoderma hamatum and the inhibited mechanism on Fusarium solani[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2022, 38(1): 81-87.
[13] Kriaa M, Hammami I, Sahnoun M, et al.Biocontrol of tomato plant diseases caused by Fusarium solani using a new isolated Aspergillus tubingensis CTM 507 glucose oxidase[J]. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2015, 338(10): 666-677.
[14] Moussa Tarek A A, Rizk M A. Biocontrol of sugarbeet pathogen Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. by Streptomyces aureofaciens[J]. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2002, 5(5): 556-559.
[15] Rojo F G, Reynoso M M, Ferez M, et al.Biological control by Trichoderma species of Fusarium solani causing peanut brown root rot under field conditions[J]. Crop Protection, 2007, 26(4): 549-555.
[16] 李凤霞, 张德罡, 姚拓. 高寒地区燕麦根际高效PGPR菌培养条件研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2004, 39(3): 316-320.
Li F X, Zhang D G, Yao T.Study on cultural conditions of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in rhizosphere of oat in alpine region[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2004, 39(3): 316-320.
[17] 黄静, 盛下放, 何琳燕. 具溶磷能力的植物内生促生细菌的分离筛选及其生物多样性[J]. 微生物学报, 2010, 50(6): 710-716.
Huang J, Sheng X F, He L Y.Isolation, screening and biodiversity of phosphorus-solubilizing endophytic bacteria from plants[J]. Acta Microbiological Sinica, 2010, 50(6): 710-716.
[18] De Lyra M C C P, Santos D C, Mondragon Jacobo C, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of endophytic bacteria associated with forage cactus (Opuntia spp.)[J]. Journal of Applied Biotechnology, 2013, 1(1): 11-16.
[19] Glickmann E, Dessaux Y.A critical examination of the specificity of the salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61(2): 793-796.
[20] 东秀珠, 蔡妙英. 常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.
Dong X Z, Cai M Y.Manual for systematic identification of common bacteria [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
[21] Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K.MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets[J]. Molecular Biology And Evolution, 2016, 33(7): 1870-1874.
[22] 刘国强, 旭格拉·哈布丁, 艾山江, 等. 黑果枸杞根际促生菌的筛选鉴定及促生能力分析[J]. 厦门大学学报, 2019, 58(1): 56-62.
Liu G Q, Habden X, Ai S J, et al.Isolation and identification of growth-promoting rhizobacteria from Lycium ruthenicumsoil and their promoting effects[J]. Journal of Xiamen University, 2019, 58(1): 56-62.
[23] 何碧珀, 郝学政, 刘红彦, 等. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌B10-26对芝麻的促生防病效果及其定殖能力分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(12): 78-83.
He B B, Hao X Z, Liu H Y, et al.Analysis of growth-promotion, disease control effect and colonization capacity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B10-26 in sesame[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 47(12): 78-83.
[24] 王明江, 章如意, 林多多, 等. 棉花黄萎病不同抗性品种内生菌数量调查与拮抗菌筛选[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2010(2): 102-104.
Wang M J, Zhang R Y, Lin D D, et al.Investigation of endophytic bacteria and screening of antagonistic bacteria in cotton verticillium wilt resistant varieties[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2010(2): 102-104.
[25] 陈奕鹏, 杨扬, 桑建伟, 等. 拮抗内生芽孢杆菌BEB17分离鉴定及其挥发性物质抑菌活性分析[J]. 植物病理学报, 2018, 48(4): 537-546.
Chen Y P, Yang Y, Sang J W, et al.Isolation and identification of antagonistic endophytic bacillus BEB17 and analysis of antibacterial activity of volatile organic compounds[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2018, 48(4): 537-546.
[26] 覃照标. 茶叶病虫害综合防治技术探讨[J]. 南方农业, 2021, 15(6): 52-53.
Tan Z B.Discussion on integrated pest control technology of tea[J]. South China Agriculture, 2021, 15(6): 52-53.
[27] 刘远康, 龚兴红. 生物技术在有机茶园病虫害防治中的应用[J]. 植物医生, 2001, 14(3): 21-26.
Liu Y K, Gong X H.Application of biotechnology in pest control of organic tea garden[J]. Plant Doctors, 2001, 14(3): 21-26.
[28] 许玫, 陈文品. 病原微生物在茶树病虫生物防治中的研究与应用[J]. 中国茶叶, 2003, 25(5): 16-17.
Xu M, Chen W P.Research and application of pathogenic microorganisms in biological control of tea plant diseases and pests[J]. China Tea, 2003, 25(5): 16-17.
[29] 高旭辉, 高曙辉. 茶树叶面微域环境的病理剖析[J]. 中国茶叶加工, 2000(4): 34-37.
Gao X H, Gao S H.Pathological analysis of tea leaf microenvironment[J]. China Tea Processing, 2000(4): 34-37.
[30] Saito S S, Hamasaka T, Nemoto S, et al.Multiresidue determination of pesticides in tea by liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry: comparison between orbitrap and time of flight mass analyzers[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 256: 140-148.
[31] Pravin V, Rosazlin A, Tumirah K, et al.Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability: a review[J]. Molecules, 2016, 21(5): 1-17.
[32] 张红, 吕家珑, 曹莹菲, 等. 不同植物秸秆腐解特性与土壤微生物功能多样性研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(4): 743-752.
Zhang H, Lv J L, Cao Y F, et al.Decomposition characteristics of different plant straws and soil microbial functional diversity[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2014, 51(4): 743-752.
[33] 李交昆, 余黄, 曾伟民, 等. 根际促生菌强化植物修复重金属污染土壤的研究进展[J]. 生命科学, 2017, 29(5): 434-442.
Li J K, Yu H, Zeng W M, et al.Research progress on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their role in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences, 2017, 29(5): 434-442.
[34] 李华山, 雷鹏, 许宗奇, 等. 耐盐促生菌Agrobacterium sp. DF-2增强黄瓜幼苗耐盐性的研究[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2017, 33(3): 654-661.
Li H S, Lei P, Xu Z Q, et al.Halotolerance in cucumber seedlings enhanced by plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Agrobacterium sp. DF-2[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agriculture Science, 2017, 33(3): 654-661.
[35] 刘方春, 邢尚军, 马海林, 等. 干旱胁迫下植物根际促生细菌对侧柏生长及生理生态特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 67-73.
Liu F C, Xing S J, Ma H L, et al.Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on physio-ecological characteristics of Platycladus orientalis under drought stress[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(6): 67-73.
[36] Khan N, Banoa A.Modulation of phytoremediation and plant growth by the treatment with PGPR, Ag nanoparticle and untreated municipal wastewater[J]. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2016, 18(12): 1258-1269.
[37] Ye M, Tang X, Yang R, Zhang H, et al.Characteristics and application of a novel species of Bacillus: Bacillus velezensis[J]. ACS Chemical Biology, 2018, 13(3): 500-505.
[38] 夏明聪, 邓晓旭, 齐红志, 等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YB-145对小麦纹枯病的防治效果及促生作用[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(10): 76-83.
Xia M C, Deng X X, Qi H Z, et al.Biological control of sharp eyespot and growth promotion in wheat by Bacillus velezensis YB-145[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(10): 76-83.
[39] Kim Y S, Lee Y, Cheon W, et al.Characterization of Bacillus velezensis AK-0 as a biocontrol agent against apple bitter rot caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80231-2.
[40] Jiang C H, Liao M J, Wang H K, et al.Bacillus velezensis, a potential and efficient biocontrol agent in control of pepper gray mold caused by Botrytis cinereal[J]. Biological Control, 2018, 126: 147-157.
[41] Guo J K, Lv X, Jia H L, et al.Effects of EDTA and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on plant growth and heavy metal uptake of hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 88: 361-369.
[42] Abid U, Sun H, Muhammad F H, et al.Phytoremediation of heavy metal assisted by plant growth promoting (PGP) bacteria[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2015, 117: 28-40.
[43] 郭军康, 董明芳, 丁永祯, 等. 根际促生菌影响植物吸收和转运重金属的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(7): 1228-1234.
Guo J K, Dong M F, Ding Y Z, et al.Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on plants heavy metal uptake and transport: a review[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(7): 1228-1234.
[44] Zhang X F, Hu Z H, Yan T, et al.Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate Cd phytotoxicity by altering Cd subcellular distribution and chemical forms in Zea mays[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safty, 2019, 171: 352-360.
[45] Georges B, Bernard D.Cell wall degrading enzymes, inhibitor proteins, and oligosaccharides participate in the molecular dialogue between plants and pathogens[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2000, 38(1/2): 157-163.
[46] Klarzynski O, Plesse B, Joubert J M, et al.Linear β-1,3 glucans are elicitors of defense responses in tobacco[J]. Plant Physiology, 2000, 124(3): 1027-1037.
[47] Lim S M, Yoon M Y, Choi G J, et al.Diffusible and volatile antifungal compounds produced by an antagonistic Bacillus velezensis G341 against various phytopathogenic fungi[J]. The Plant Pathology Journal, 2017, 33(5): 488-498.
[48] Chowdhury S P, Hartmann A, Gao X W, et al.Biocontrol mechanism by root associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42: a review[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015, 6: 780. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780.
[49] Xu S, Liu Y X, Cernava T, et al.Fusarium fruiting body microbiome member Pantoea agglomerans inhibits fungal pathogenesis by targeting lipid rafts[J]. Nature Microbiology, 2022, 7(6): 831-843.