排序检验法和Napping-UFP法在皖西黄茶实物标准样研制中的应用

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2023.02.011

茶叶科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 275-286.doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2023.02.011

排序检验法和Napping-UFP法在皖西黄茶实物标准样研制中的应用

张莹^1,2, 邱桐^1,2, 韩梓怡¹, 安琪^1,2, 赵潇奕^1,2, 姜青^1,2, 李露青^1,2, 宁井铭^1,2, 宛晓春^1,2, 戴前颖^1,2,*

1.安徽农业大学茶与食品科技学院,安徽合肥 230036;
2.安徽农业大学茶树生物学及资源利用国家重点实验室,安徽合肥 230036

收稿日期:2022-10-26 修回日期:2022-12-21 出版日期:2023-04-15 发布日期:2023-05-05
通讯作者: *daiqianying@ahau.edu.cn
作者简介:张莹,女,硕士研究生,主要从事茶叶审评与品质调控方面研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFD1601102）、财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系（CARS-19）

Application of Ranking and Napping-UFP in the Development of Standard Yellow Tea Samples from Western Anhui Province

ZHANG Ying^1,2, QIU Tong^1,2, HAN Ziyi¹, AN Qi^1,2, ZHAO Xiaoyi^1,2, JIANG Qing^1,2, LI Luqing^1,2, NING Jingming^1,2, WAN Xiaochun^1,2, DAI Qianying^1,2,*

1. School of Tea and Food Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

Received:2022-10-26 Revised:2022-12-21 Online:2023-04-15 Published:2023-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 制定具有标准级差代表性的实物标准样对黄茶的生产流通具有重要意义。分别招募80名普通消费者和22名初级评价员,对皖西黄茶的3大类（黄芽茶、黄小茶、黄大茶）9个等级实物标准样进行排序检验及Napping-UFP法分析。结果表明,在排序检验法中仅依据外形可基本实现对8个标准样的判定（其中黄芽特级与一级不能判别）;在Napping-UFP法中,22名初级评价员仅根据外形也能较好地区分不同等级的黄茶样品,根据香气或滋味可以准确区分黄芽茶、黄小茶和黄大茶,并能准确区分黄大茶的轻火样和足火样;同时初级评价员给出了较为丰富的描述词（外形33个,香气21个,滋味24个）,外形描述词中的“绿”“黄”“多梗”,香气描述词中的“嫩香”“甜香”“烟丝”,滋味描述词中的“鲜”词频较高,可以用于皖西黄茶实物标准样的级差判别,有利于消费者的理解与接受,以及皖西黄茶的市场推广。

关键词: 皖西黄茶, 黄茶标准样, 排序检验法, Napping-UFP

Abstract: It is of great significance for the production and popularization of yellow tea with standard grade difference. In this paper, 9 yellow tea samples of 3 categories (yellow bud tea, small-leaf yellow tea, large-leaf yellow tea) from western Anhui province were selected. Then 80 consumers and 22 assessors were recruited to analyze these samples using ranking and Napping-UFP respectively. The results show that the 8 standard samples can be distinguished according to the appearance by ranking, except the super class and the first class of bud tea. In Napping-UFP, 22 assessors could distinguish different grades of samples by appearance. The categories (yellow bud tea, small-leaf yellow tea and large-leaf yellow tea) and the roasting degrees (light fire and sufficient fire) could be accurately distinguished based on their aroma or taste. At the same time, the assessors provided relatively rich descriptive terms (33 of appearance, 21 of aroma and 24 of taste), including "green", "yellow" and "fairly stalk" in the appearance attributes, "tend aroma", "sweet aroma" and "tobacco" in the aroma attributes, and "fresh" in the taste attributes. These terms could be used to accurately assess yellow tea from western Anhui province, which is conducive to consumers’ understanding and acceptance, as well as the market promotion of yellow tea from western Anhui province.

Key words: yellow tea from western Anhui province, standard samples of yellow tea, ranking, Napping-UFP

中图分类号:

S571.1

张莹, 邱桐, 韩梓怡, 安琪, 赵潇奕, 姜青, 李露青, 宁井铭, 宛晓春, 戴前颖. 排序检验法和Napping-UFP法在皖西黄茶实物标准样研制中的应用[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(2): 275-286. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2023.02.011.

ZHANG Ying, QIU Tong, HAN Ziyi, AN Qi, ZHAO Xiaoyi, JIANG Qing, LI Luqing, NING Jingming, WAN Xiaochun, DAI Qianying. Application of Ranking and Napping-UFP in the Development of Standard Yellow Tea Samples from Western Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2023, 43(2): 275-286. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2023.02.011.

参考文献 20

[1]	安徽农业大学茶树生物学与资源利用国家重点实验室. 皖西黄茶加工技术规程: DB34/T 2891—2017[S]. [出版地不详]: [出版者不详], 2017.State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization. Technical Specification for Yellow tea Processing in Western Anhui Province: DB34/T 2891—2017 [S]. [s.n.]: [s.n.], 2017.
[2]	卫聿铭, 宁井铭, 张梁, 等. 黄茶功能性成分与健康功效研究进展[J]. 中国茶叶, 2021, 43(10): 46-54.Wei Y M, Ning J M, Zhang L, et al.Research progress on functional components and health effects of yellow tea[J]. China Tea, 2021, 43(10): 46-54.
[3]	Escudero-Gilete M L, Meléndez-Martínez A J, Heredia F J, et al. Optimization of olive-fruit paste production using a methodological proposal based on a sensory and objective color analysis[J]. Grasas Y Aceites, 2009, 60(4): 396-404.
[4]	吴吉玲, 黄一珍, 姜鹏飞, 等. 排序法在大西洋鲭鱼脱腥工艺筛选中的应用[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(23): 73-79.Wu J L, Huang Y Z, Jiang P F, et al.Applicatian of ranking test in screening of atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) deodorization process[J]. Food Research and Development, 2020, 41(23): 73-79.
[5]	Marques C, Correia E, Dinis L, et al.An overview of sensory characterization techniques: from classical descriptive analysis to the emergence of novel profiling methods[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(3): 255. doi: 10.3390/foods11030255.
[6]	Penelope O, Sara C, Edwin P, et al.Comparison of quantitative descriptive analysis to the napping methodology with and without product training[J]. Journal of Sensory Studies, 2018, 33(3): e12331. doi: 10.1111/joss.12331.
[7]	Jing L, Wender L P B, Emma S, et al. Comparison of rapid descriptive sensory methodologies: Free-Choice Profiling, Flash Profile and modified Flash Profile[J]. Food Research International, 2018, 106: 892-900.
[8]	Lucía A, Leticia V, Luis D S, et al.Comparison of consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization: case study with four sample sets of powdered drinks[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2017, 56: 149-163.
[9]	Pickup W, Bremer P, Peng M.Comparing conventional Descriptive Analysis and Napping(R)-UFP against physiochemical measurements: a case study using apples[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018, 98(4): 1476-1484.
[10]	李元一, 邢可馨, 张葆春, 等. 基于全二维气相色谱-飞行时间质谱及感官分析的中法白兰地香气特征研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(14): 198-203.Li Y Y, Xing K X, Zhang B C, et al.Aroma characterization of Chinese and French brandy based on comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(14): 198-203.
[11]	Jing L, Marlene S G, Rossella D M, et al.Performance of Flash Profile and Napping with and without training for describing small sensory differences in a model wine[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2016, 48: 41-49.
[12]	Alanah B, Lydia H, Connor D R, et al.Use of different panellists (experienced, trained, consumers and experts) and the projective mapping task to evaluate white wine[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2020, 83: 103900. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103900.
[13]	Helene H, Hildegarde H.A summary of projective mapping observations: the effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2013, 28(1): 168-181.
[14]	田欣, 张会宁, 祁新春, 等. 快速感官分析技术在葡萄酒香气感官分析中的应用[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(21): 215-220.Tian X, Zhang H N, Qi X C, et al.The application of rapid sensory profiling technique in wine aroma sensory analysis[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019, 45(21): 215-220.
[15]	Young-Kyung K, Laureen J, Dominique V, et al.A cross-cultural study using Napping®: Do Korean and French consumers perceive various green tea products differently?[J]. Food Research International, 2013, 53(1): 534-542.
[16]	Esmerino E A, Filho E R T, Carr B T, et al. Consumer-based product characterization using Pivot Profile, Projective Mapping and Check-all-that-apply (CATA): a comparative case with Greek yogurt samples[J]. Food Research International, 2017, 99: 375-384.
[17]	Pineau N, Girardi A, Lacoste G C, et al.Comparison of RATA, CATA, sorting and Napping® as rapid alternatives to sensory profiling in a food industry environment[J]. Food Research International, 2022, 158: 111467. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111467.
[18]	Morales J, Tomas-Vidal A, Phoco E, et al.An approach to the Spanish consumer's perception of the sensory quality of environmentally friendly seabass[J]. Foods, 2021, 10(11): 2694. doi: 10.3390/foods10112694.
[19]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 茶叶感官审评方法: GB/T 23776—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Methodology for sensory evaluation of tea: GB/T 23776—2018 [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2018.
[20]	Christian D, Per B B, Wender L P B. Confidence ellipses: a variation based on parametric bootstrapping applicable on Multiple Factor Analysis results for rapid graphical evaluation[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2012, 26(2): 278-280.

排序检验法和Napping-UFP法在皖西黄茶实物标准样研制中的应用

Application of Ranking and Napping-UFP in the Development of Standard Yellow Tea Samples from Western Anhui Province

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	汤海昆, 张兰军, 张盼盼, 刘本英. 茶叶中生物碱类化学成分及其生物活性的研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 727-741.
[2]	李桂楠, 杨妮, 罗微, 张佳琪, 胡志航, 熊爱生, 郝建楠, 庄静. CsDET2基因的鉴定及其对茶树光周期与非生物胁迫的响应分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 742-756.
[3]	范延艮, 萧越, 孟凡月, 刘文杰, 张颖, 孙平, 张丽霞, 任丽军. 紫芽茶树品种‘紫娟'花青素合成酶基因CsANS1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 757-769.
[4]	涂一怡, 张幼, 徐婷, 陈俊杰, 王玉春, 吕务云. 基于环介导等温扩增技术检测Colletotrichum camelliae[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 770-782.
[5]	江丽, 李朵姣, 胡新荣, 沈英姿, 郑寨生, 翁晓星, 刘淑婧, 边晓东, 袁名安, 陈暄. 不同栽培模式对籽叶双收茶树新梢生理生化特性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 783-794.
[6]	王开荣, 张龙杰, 梁月荣, 黎晓湘, 郑新强. 茶树叶色鉴别、分类研究与叶色体系构建[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 795-807.
[7]	李婧, 胡新龙, 唐慧珊, 郭金灵, 胡光灿, 冯德品, 仇方方, 王明乐. 基于感官评价和代谢组学的不同嫩度宜红工夫茶品质特征分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 808-820.
[8]	郭瑜, 肖刘雨, 杜秋怡, 田野, 韩宇. 青砖茶水提多糖与茶渣碱提多糖综合提取工艺优化及乳液负载体系研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 821-840.
[9]	苏林, 黄子豪, 孙丹, 陈金华, 郑亚杰, 陆英. 基于网络药理学和斑马鱼模型研究白茶中主要化合物降血糖作用[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 841-851.
[10]	王永慧, 王多锋, 李学敏, 史田斌, 武立栋, 刘在国, 张广忠, 赵风云. 甘肃陇南和浙江金华绿茶的理化成分及体外抗氧化差异性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 852-864.
[11]	陈峻锐, 胡钧铭, 石元值, 韦翔华, 宋传奎, 张俊辉, 郑富海, 索广利. 炭基肥对茶园土壤团聚体有机碳物理稳定性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 865-878.
[12]	李兵, 朱勇, 夏程龙, 李飞龙, 蔡振洋, 吴昊. 基于改进YOLOv5s的碾茶轻量化在线分选方法[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 879-897.
[13]	孟超, 梁涛, 张霞, 王万红, 董煌林, 李明. 基于茶树种植和光伏发电的茶光互补模式研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 898-908.
[14]	周逸德, 陈家霖, 吴俊梅, 赵竑博, 孙彬妹, 刘少群, 郑鹏. 茶树氮代谢基因：环境胁迫适应机制与育种应用研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(4): 545-558.
[15]	孙梦真, 胡志航, 杨凯欣, 张佳琪, 张楠, 熊爱生, 刘慧, 庄静. 茶树生物钟CsLUX基因的鉴定及其对光合特性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(4): 559-570.